<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sensory Perception</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jrobertking.com/2009/12/sensory-perception/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jrobertking.com/2009/12/sensory-perception/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 02:21:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob King</title>
		<link>http://jrobertking.com/2009/12/sensory-perception/comment-page-1/#comment-1140</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 00:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrobertking.com/?p=234#comment-1140</guid>
		<description>What a brilliant article, Joshua. Thanks for sharing it!

Yes, when I was first starting out in the publishing industry 23 years ago, I bemoaned our shift from the sounds of industrial age machines to computer-age machines. I had (still have) a 1923 Underwood typewriter that I used throughout college to write my papers, and there was something viscerally satisfying about the scrape and clank of that thing, the ratcheting of the gears, and tink of that tiny bell, the grating of the carriage return. My typewriter had so much more character than my computer, with its plastic keys and its green-glowing screen, the dot-matrix printer that burbled and grunted and then shrieked its way, a quarter of a line at a time, across the page.

Now, the sounds of that printer are gone, as well. Our modern printers are demure things, only occasionally scraping the next sheet out of the tray.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a brilliant article, Joshua. Thanks for sharing it!</p>
<p>Yes, when I was first starting out in the publishing industry 23 years ago, I bemoaned our shift from the sounds of industrial age machines to computer-age machines. I had (still have) a 1923 Underwood typewriter that I used throughout college to write my papers, and there was something viscerally satisfying about the scrape and clank of that thing, the ratcheting of the gears, and tink of that tiny bell, the grating of the carriage return. My typewriter had so much more character than my computer, with its plastic keys and its green-glowing screen, the dot-matrix printer that burbled and grunted and then shrieked its way, a quarter of a line at a time, across the page.</p>
<p>Now, the sounds of that printer are gone, as well. Our modern printers are demure things, only occasionally scraping the next sheet out of the tray.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://jrobertking.com/2009/12/sensory-perception/comment-page-1/#comment-1139</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrobertking.com/?p=234#comment-1139</guid>
		<description>I just read an interesting article by David Pogue (Tech writer for New York Times) about how common analog sounds are fading from our society.  It brought me back to this post of yours about how to connect readers to what&#039;s happening.  

Just curious what your thoughts are on this now that new readers won&#039;t have the same association with sounds that were previously part of our daily lives?  Maybe a new blog post?

http://pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/03/the-fading-sounds-of-analog-technology/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read an interesting article by David Pogue (Tech writer for New York Times) about how common analog sounds are fading from our society.  It brought me back to this post of yours about how to connect readers to what&#8217;s happening.  </p>
<p>Just curious what your thoughts are on this now that new readers won&#8217;t have the same association with sounds that were previously part of our daily lives?  Maybe a new blog post?</p>
<p><a href="http://pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/03/the-fading-sounds-of-analog-technology/" rel="nofollow">http://pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/03/the-fading-sounds-of-analog-technology/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://jrobertking.com/2009/12/sensory-perception/comment-page-1/#comment-723</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 03:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrobertking.com/?p=234#comment-723</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Curtis! I&#039;m glad to help. It&#039;s great to hear from someone who appreciates the finer points of writing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Curtis! I&#8217;m glad to help. It&#8217;s great to hear from someone who appreciates the finer points of writing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curtis</title>
		<link>http://jrobertking.com/2009/12/sensory-perception/comment-page-1/#comment-722</link>
		<dc:creator>Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrobertking.com/?p=234#comment-722</guid>
		<description>I have for over thirty years read/heard various writers, writing instructors, and associated gurus attempt to explain &quot;Sensory Perception&quot; in lengthy chapters and long lectures. I early on decided it was the comic relief portion of their offerings.     

 You, Sir,  nailed it in a single page!   I realize such a short article would diminish the length of many a writing book. But, the reader would understand what &quot; Sensory Perception&quot; was all about.

I salute you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have for over thirty years read/heard various writers, writing instructors, and associated gurus attempt to explain &#8220;Sensory Perception&#8221; in lengthy chapters and long lectures. I early on decided it was the comic relief portion of their offerings.     </p>
<p> You, Sir,  nailed it in a single page!   I realize such a short article would diminish the length of many a writing book. But, the reader would understand what &#8221; Sensory Perception&#8221; was all about.</p>
<p>I salute you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob King</title>
		<link>http://jrobertking.com/2009/12/sensory-perception/comment-page-1/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrobertking.com/?p=234#comment-678</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Joshua! I hope you&#039;re still doing some creative writing. With me, it&#039;s a compulsion. Description helps me not only communicate ideas to readers but also experience the story myself.

Thanks again for your comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Joshua! I hope you&#8217;re still doing some creative writing. With me, it&#8217;s a compulsion. Description helps me not only communicate ideas to readers but also experience the story myself.</p>
<p>Thanks again for your comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://jrobertking.com/2009/12/sensory-perception/comment-page-1/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jrobertking.com/?p=234#comment-669</guid>
		<description>Very interesting about how to deliberately use the different senses in stories.  Could have used those tips in high school during creative writing.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting about how to deliberately use the different senses in stories.  Could have used those tips in high school during creative writing.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

